I just finished watching Palin's interview with Chris Wallace, and I am currently taking my usual anti-venom shots to recover. Wow, was she on a rampage or what?
She went after the President, Frank Bailey, Mitt Romney, and everybody who dares questions her intelligence. Which, I guess is everybody.
That was even uglier than usual!
I need to ask for your help in locating the video and transcript of this interview so that I can post all of it.
Thanks ahead of time.
Update: Here is the video.
(H/T tip to Bree Palin for the clip. Thank you!)
And here is the transcript. Thanks for the assist gang!
I will be adding to this post as time permits.
Update 2:
WALLACE: I got to ask you real quickly about that, though. You realized that you messed up about Paul Revere, don't you?
PALIN: You know what? I didn't mess up about Paul Revere. Here is what Paul Revere did. He warned the Americans that the British were coming, the British were coming, and they were going to try take our arms and we got to make sure that we were protecting ourselves and shoring up all of ammunitions and our firearms so that they couldn't take it.
But remember that the British had already been there, many soldiers for seven years in that area. And part of Paul Revere's ride -- and it wasn't just one ride -- he was a courier, he was a messenger. Part of his ride was to warn the British that we're already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. You're not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well- armed persons, individual, private militia that we have. He did warn the British.
And in a shout-out, gotcha type of question that was asked of me, I answered candidly. And I know my American history.
I see that her minions, and researchers, tried to dig up answers for her to use so that made she did not seem so ignorant, but it is much too late for that. Everybody who saw that clip KNOWS she did not have any idea what she was talking about, and trying to change history (Which apparently her people are literally doing by trying to edit Revere's Wikipedia page.) will never make her seem intelligent.
WALLACE: All right. I want to talk about a controversy because this week, Alaska officials, as you well know, are going to release thousands of pages of your e-mails as governor. Are you worried that some of those emails could be damaging?
PALIN: No, because, you know, I think every rock in the Palin household that could ever be kicked over and uncovered anything, it's already been kicked over. I don't think there's anything private in our family now. A lot of those emails obviously weren't meant for public consumption. They are between staff members. They're probably between family members.
So, you know what, I'm sure people are going to capitalize on this opportunity to go through 25,000 emails and perhaps take things out of context. (In Palin-speak that means to tell the truth about them.)They'll never truly know what the context of each one of the emails was, or each one of the issues were that I was working on that day, or in that time period.
But whatever, Chris. It's like nothing surprises me anymore. We'll keep doing what we're doing. I'm going to keep going forward with solutions that I want to see applied to this great country, the challenges that we're facing. And things like that are going to be perhaps a distraction for others. They won't distract me.
Especially since Palin is confident that the really damaging stuff has been redacted or is contained in of those 2,415 e-mails that will never see the light of day. Remember it is HER people who are combing through these e-mails.
WALLACE: Let me just ask one follow-up in that regard, because one of your former advisers, Frank Bailey, has written a book. And in it, he says, and he uses some of your e-mails because he was the recipient of them, he says that there were times when you were unethical, that he was told to write fake letters to the editor under false names or to spend hours manipulating TV polls by voting on the phone over and over again.
PALIN: Those are complete lies, Chris. And I say it unequivocally that Frank Bailey has some ethical problems of his own. In fact, out the 25,000 employees that I was in charge of, 24,000, in Alaska, and in our large administration, and with the $14 billion that we were working on, heady things, big things were working on, only one person in the entire administration had to undergo ethics training. And it was because of blunders that this individual, Frank Bailey, would engage in, and result in.
It was Frank Bailey who still under investigation today, but making money off of taking private emails from somebody after having hoarded them for some years. It was only Frank Bailey who was ordered to undergo ethics training. So, he's got some issues.
Frank Bailey has ethical problems because he lied and broke rules ON PALIN'S BEHALF! Palin took a church going, highly ethical man, and poisoned his mind until he did things that were totally out of character for him. Which by the way, is the fate of ANYBODY that gets too close to Sister Sarah. Remember Meg Stapleton? Bill McAllister? Rebecca Mansour? Ever wonder why her kids act the way that they do?
What? Do you think all of that is just a coincidence?
And as for telling lies? Frank Bailey has un-redacted e-mails to back up HIS version of events. I wonder if this hypocrite is willing to put up HER e-mails, completely un-redacted, to show where Bailey lied in his book? Don't bother holding your breath.
This woman horribly damages the people that she directly comes into contact with, and she will do the same to our country. In fact, she already has.
No comments:
Post a Comment