Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Check out those bug eyes. She has NO idea what to say to this line of questioning."I am running for the Presidency of the United States. I am not running to be anyone's judge."
"But you have judged them."
"I..I..I don't judge them. I don't judge them. I am running for Presidency of the United States
WTF? Gregory reads off her own statements and she acts as if she has never heard them before.
And besides these clearly homophobic statements, she and her husband have charged the Federal government, through Medicaid, to provide psychologically damaging "reparative" therapies in an attempt to alter the sexual proclivities of homosexual men. If she and her husband Marcus had not judged this lifestyle as deviant than why would they provide a service to try and change it?
When Bachmann is asked if, as President (I'm sorry "Presidency"), she would appoint an openly gay person to her cabinet or to the courts, she lists three criteria: "Where do they stand on the Constitution, are you competent, and do you share my views?"
It should be crystal clear to anybody that, based on Bachmann's stated opinion about homosexuality, that the last one ("Do you share my views?"), ABSOLUTELY precludes any chance of a gay man or woman being provided any opportunities during a Bachmann Presidency.
I know she and her people probably think she effectively danced around that question, but I have little doubt that most Americans, especially gay Americans, had little trouble recognizing how the rights of homosexuals would be treated if Michele Bachmann had her way.
By the way, I am not a David Gregory fan as a rule, but I thought he did a pretty good job here.
No comments:
Post a Comment